first commit

This commit is contained in:
robojerk 2025-09-05 07:10:12 -07:00
commit 7584207f76
72 changed files with 12801 additions and 0 deletions

320
development-plan.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
# Debian bootc-image-builder Development Plan
## Project Overview
Create a Debian equivalent of the Fedora bootc-image-builder that can build bootable disk images from Debian bootc containers. The tool will adapt the existing architecture to work with the APT/DEB package management system while maintaining compatibility with the same output formats and functionality.
## Goals
1. **Primary Goal**: Create a functional Debian bootc-image-builder for Debian 13 (Trixie)
2. **Secondary Goal**: Implement flexible configuration system to avoid hardcoded values
3. **Tertiary Goal**: Maintain compatibility with existing bootc ecosystem
4. **Focus**: Initially target only Debian 13 (Trixie) for development and testing
## Architecture Adaptation
### Core Components to Adapt
1. **Package Management System**
- Replace DNF/RPM with APT/DEB
- Adapt package resolution logic
- Update repository handling
2. **Distribution Definitions**
- Create Debian-specific package lists for Trixie
- Adapt YAML structure for Debian packages
- Focus on Debian 13 (Trixie) initially
3. **Container Base Images**
- Replace Fedora base with Debian Trixie
- Update package installation commands (dnf -> apt)
- Adapt container build process
- Use debian-forge packages (bootc, apt-ostree, osbuild)
4. **Configuration System**
- Implement flexible registry configuration
- Create version mapping system
- Add container naming templates
## Implementation Phases
### Phase 1: Foundation Setup
**Duration**: 1-2 weeks
**Priority**: High
1. **Project Structure Setup**
- Create `bib/cmd/debian-bootc-image-builder/` directory
- Set up Go module with Debian-specific dependencies
- Create basic project structure
2. **Configuration System Implementation**
- Implement `.config/registry.yaml` configuration system
- Create configuration loading and validation
- Add support for multiple registry environments
3. **Basic CLI Framework**
- Adapt main.go for Debian-specific naming
- Update help text and documentation
- Implement basic command structure
### Phase 2: Package Management Integration
**Duration**: 2-3 weeks
**Priority**: High
1. **APT Integration**
- Replace DNF solver with APT-based solution
- Implement package dependency resolution
- Create APT repository handling
2. **Package Cache Management**
- Adapt `/rpmmd` volume to `/aptcache` or similar
- Implement APT package caching
- Handle package metadata storage
3. **Repository Configuration**
- Support Debian repositories (main, contrib, non-free)
- Add support for custom repositories
- Implement repository priority handling
### Phase 3: Distribution Definitions
**Duration**: 1-2 weeks
**Priority**: High
1. **Debian Package Lists**
- Create `debian-stable.yaml` (Trixie)
- Create `debian-testing.yaml` (Forky)
- Create `debian-unstable.yaml` (Sid)
- Define package sets for different image types
2. **Package Definition Structure**
- Adapt YAML structure for Debian packages
- Support different package categories
- Handle package version specifications
### Phase 4: Image Building Logic
**Duration**: 2-3 weeks
**Priority**: High
1. **Manifest Generation**
- Adapt image.go for Debian-specific logic
- Update partition table handling
- Implement Debian-specific boot configuration
2. **Filesystem Support**
- Support ext4, xfs, btrfs filesystems
- Implement Debian-specific filesystem options
- Handle boot partition configuration
3. **Kernel and Boot Configuration**
- Adapt kernel options for Debian
- Implement GRUB configuration
- Handle UEFI/BIOS boot modes
### Phase 5: Container Build System
**Duration**: 1-2 weeks
**Priority**: Medium
1. **Containerfile Adaptation**
- Replace Fedora base with Debian
- Update package installation commands
- Adapt build process for Debian
2. **Runtime Dependencies**
- Identify required Debian packages
- Update package installation lists
- Test container build process
### Phase 6: Testing and Validation
**Duration**: 2-3 weeks
**Priority**: High
1. **Unit Testing**
- Adapt existing Go tests
- Create Debian-specific test cases
- Test package resolution logic
2. **Integration Testing**
- Test with real Debian bootc containers
- Validate output image formats
- Test different Debian versions
3. **End-to-End Testing**
- Build and boot test images
- Validate system functionality
- Performance testing
### Phase 7: Documentation and Polish
**Duration**: 1-2 weeks
**Priority**: Medium
1. **Documentation**
- Update README for Debian
- Create usage examples
- Document configuration options
2. **Error Handling**
- Improve error messages
- Add helpful troubleshooting info
- Validate input parameters
## Debian-Forge Package Integration
The project will use packages from the debian-forge repository:
### Key Packages
1. **bootc**: Bootable container runtime (equivalent to Fedora's bootc)
2. **apt-ostree**: APT-based ostree implementation (equivalent to rpm-ostree)
3. **osbuild**: Image building tool (same name as Fedora version)
### Package Sources
- **Repository**: https://packages.debian-forge.org
- **Components**: main
- **Priority**: 400 (lower than main Debian repos)
- **Architecture**: Available for amd64, arm64, and other architectures
### Integration Strategy
- Use debian-forge as primary source for bootc-related packages
- Fall back to main Debian repositories for standard packages
- Handle package dependencies and conflicts appropriately
## Technical Challenges and Solutions
### Challenge 1: Package Management Differences
**Problem**: DNF and APT have different APIs and behaviors
**Solution**:
- Create APT wrapper similar to dnfjson.Solver
- Implement package resolution using APT libraries
- Handle package metadata differently
- Integrate debian-forge repository for bootc packages
### Challenge 2: Repository Management
**Problem**: Debian repositories have different structure than Fedora
**Solution**:
- Implement Debian repository handling
- Support multiple repository types
- Handle repository priorities and pinning
### Challenge 3: Distribution Versioning
**Problem**: Debian uses codenames (stable, testing, unstable) vs numeric versions
**Solution**:
- Implement codename to version mapping
- Focus on Debian 13 (Trixie) initially
- Support both codename and numeric version inputs
- Handle version transitions (e.g., stable updates)
### Challenge 4: Boot Configuration
**Problem**: Debian may have different boot requirements
**Solution**:
- Research Debian boot requirements
- Adapt kernel options and boot configuration
- Test with different hardware configurations
## Configuration System Design
### Registry Configuration (`.config/registry.yaml`)
```yaml
registries:
development:
base_url: "git.raines.xyz"
namespace: "debian"
auth_required: true
production:
base_url: "docker.io"
namespace: "debian"
auth_required: false
active_registry: "development"
containers:
bootc_base: "{registry}/{namespace}/debian-bootc:{version}"
bootc_builder: "{registry}/{namespace}/bootc-image-builder:{tag}"
versions:
debian:
stable: "trixie"
testing: "forky"
unstable: "sid"
```
### Benefits of Flexible Configuration
1. **Rapid Development**: Easy to switch between development and production
2. **Version Management**: Centralized version mapping
3. **Registry Flexibility**: Support multiple container registries
4. **Environment Adaptation**: Easy deployment in different environments
## File Structure Plan
```
bib/
├── cmd/
│ └── debian-bootc-image-builder/ # Main Debian application
│ ├── main.go # Adapted main.go
│ ├── image.go # Debian-specific image logic
│ ├── apt.go # APT integration
│ ├── config.go # Configuration management
│ └── [other adapted files]
├── data/
│ └── defs/
│ ├── debian-stable.yaml # Trixie packages
│ ├── debian-testing.yaml # Forky packages
│ └── debian-unstable.yaml # Sid packages
├── internal/
│ ├── distrodef/ # Adapted distro definitions
│ ├── imagetypes/ # Image type management
│ └── config/ # Configuration system
└── .config/
└── registry.yaml # Registry configuration
```
## Success Criteria
1. **Functional Requirements**
- Build bootable images from Debian bootc containers
- Support all output formats (qcow2, ami, vmdk, etc.)
- Handle multiple Debian versions
- Provide flexible configuration
2. **Quality Requirements**
- Comprehensive test coverage
- Clear documentation
- Good error handling
- Performance comparable to Fedora version
3. **Compatibility Requirements**
- Compatible with existing bootc ecosystem
- Support same CLI interface
- Maintain configuration file compatibility
## Risk Mitigation
1. **Technical Risks**
- **Risk**: APT integration complexity
- **Mitigation**: Start with simple APT wrapper, iterate
2. **Compatibility Risks**
- **Risk**: Breaking changes in Debian
- **Mitigation**: Test with multiple Debian versions
3. **Performance Risks**
- **Risk**: Slower than Fedora version
- **Mitigation**: Profile and optimize critical paths
## Timeline Summary
- **Phase 1-2**: Foundation and Package Management (3-5 weeks)
- **Phase 3-4**: Distribution and Image Building (3-5 weeks)
- **Phase 5-6**: Container and Testing (3-5 weeks)
- **Phase 7**: Documentation and Polish (1-2 weeks)
**Total Estimated Duration**: 10-17 weeks
## Next Steps
1. Set up development environment
2. Create basic project structure
3. Implement configuration system
4. Begin APT integration work
5. Create initial Debian package definitions
This plan provides a structured approach to creating a Debian bootc-image-builder while maintaining the flexibility and functionality of the original Fedora version.