particle-os/debian-forge-composer
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

go.mod: update github.com/containers/image/v5

Browse source 
Version 5.22 introduced a new option to /etc/containers/policy.json called
keyPaths, see

https://github.com/containers/image/pull/1609

EL9 immediately took advantage of this new feature and started using it, see
04645c4a84

This quickly became an issue in our code: The go library (containers/image)
parses the configuration file very strictly and refuses to create a client
when policy.json with an unknown key is present on the filesystem. As we
used 5.21.1 that doesn't know the new key, our unit tests started to
failing when containers-common was present.

Reproducer:
podman run --pull=always --rm -it centos:stream9
dnf install -y dnf-plugins-core
dnf config-manager --set-enabled crb
dnf install -y gpgme-devel libassuan-devel krb5-devel golang git-core
git clone https://github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer
cd osbuild-composer

# install the new containers-common and run the test
dnf install -y https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/packages/containers-common/1/44.el9/x86_64/containers-common-1-44.el9.x86_64.rpm
go test -count 1 ./...

# this returns:
--- FAIL: TestClientResolve (0.00s)
    client_test.go:31:
        	Error Trace:	client_test.go:31
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	Unknown key "keyPaths"
        	            	invalid policy in "/etc/containers/policy.json"
        	            	github.com/containers/image/v5/signature.NewPolicyFromFile
        	            		/osbuild-composer/vendor/github.com/containers/image/v5/signature/policy_config.go:88
        	            	github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/container.NewClient
        	            		/osbuild-composer/internal/container/client.go:123
        	            	github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/container_test.TestClientResolve
        	            		/osbuild-composer/internal/container/client_test.go:29
        	            	testing.tRunner
        	            		/usr/lib/golang/src/testing/testing.go:1439
        	            	runtime.goexit
        	            		/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1571
        	Test:       	TestClientResolve
    client_test.go:32:
        	Error Trace:	client_test.go:32
        	Error:      	Expected value not to be nil.
        	Test:       	TestClientResolve

 When run with an older containers-common, it succeeds:
 dnf install -y https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/packages/containers-common/1/40.el9/x86_64/containers-common-1-40.el9.x86_64.rpm
 go test -count 1 ./...
 PASS

To sum it up, I had to upgrade github.com/containers/image/v5 to v5.22.0.
Unfortunately, this wasn't so simple, see

go get github.com/containers/image/v5@latest
go: github.com/containers/image/v5@v5.22.0 requires
	github.com/letsencrypt/boulder@v0.0.0-20220331220046-b23ab962616e requires
	github.com/honeycombio/beeline-go@v1.1.1 requires
	github.com/gobuffalo/pop/v5@v5.3.1 requires
	github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3@v2.0.3+incompatible: reading github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3/go.mod at revision v2.0.3: unknown revision v2.0.3

It turns out that github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3@v2.0.3+incompatible has been
recently retracted https://github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3/pull/998 and this
broke a ton of packages depending on it. I was able to fix it by adding

exclude github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 v2.0.3+incompatible

to our go.mod, see
https://github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3/issues/975#issuecomment-955661657

After adding it,
go get github.com/containers/image/v5@latest
succeeded and tools/prepare-source.sh took care of the rest.

Signed-off-by: Ondřej Budai <ondrej@budai.cz>
This commit is contained in:
Ondřej Budai 2022-08-28 20:29:14 +02:00 • committed by Tomáš Hozza
parent fa514c5326
commit 29f66a251f
694 changed files with 90636 additions and 50426 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22
vendor/github.com/titanous/rocacheck/LICENSE generated vendored Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
MIT License
Copyright (c) 2017, Jonathan Rudenberg
Copyright (c) 2017, CRoCS, EnigmaBridge Ltd.
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.

7
vendor/github.com/titanous/rocacheck/README.md generated vendored Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
# rocacheck [![GoDoc](https://godoc.org/github.com/titanous/rocacheck?status.svg)](https://godoc.org/github.com/titanous/rocacheck)
Package rocacheck is a Go implementation of the [key fingerprint
algorithm](https://github.com/crocs-muni/roca) that checks if an RSA key was
generated by broken Infineon code and is vulnerable to factorization via the
[Return of Coppersmith's Attack
(ROCA)](https://crocs.fi.muni.cz/public/papers/rsa_ccs17) / CVE-2017-15361.

52
vendor/github.com/titanous/rocacheck/rocacheck.go generated vendored Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
// Package rocacheck checks if a key was generated by broken Infineon code and
// is vulnerable to factorization via the Return of Coppersmith's Attack (ROCA)
// / CVE-2017-15361.
package rocacheck
import (
"crypto/rsa"
"math/big"
)
type test struct {
Prime *big.Int
Fingerprints map[int64]struct{}
}
var tests = make([]test, 17)
func init() {
bigOne := big.NewInt(1)
n := &big.Int{}
// relations table from https://github.com/crocs-muni/roca/pull/40
for i, r := range [][2]int64{
{2, 11}, {6, 13}, {8, 17}, {9, 19}, {3, 37}, {26, 53}, {20, 61},
{35, 71}, {24, 73}, {13, 79}, {6, 97}, {51, 103}, {53, 107},
{54, 109}, {42, 127}, {50, 151}, {78, 157},
} {
fps := make(map[int64]struct{})
bp := big.NewInt(r[1])
br := big.NewInt(r[0])
for j := int64(0); j < r[1]; j++ {
if n.Exp(big.NewInt(j), br, bp).Cmp(bigOne) == 0 {
fps[j] = struct{}{}
}
}
tests[i] = test{
Prime: big.NewInt(r[1]),
Fingerprints: fps,
}
}
}
// IsWeak returns true if a RSA public key is vulnerable to Return of
// Coppersmith's Attack (ROCA).
func IsWeak(k *rsa.PublicKey) bool {
tmp := &big.Int{}
for _, t := range tests {
if _, ok := t.Fingerprints[tmp.Mod(k.N, t.Prime).Int64()]; !ok {
return false
}
}
return true
}