The helper functions were never used, we should aim to use the
osbuild types just as regular structs for serialization purposes.
Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
If the user creates a new blueprint with no version specified, the
blueprint struct uses "0.0.0" as the default version. Blueprint tests
for a blueprint with an empty version now expect no error.
This changes osbuild-composer's behavior to match lorax-composer when
encountering invalid versions. Instead of leaving them as-is it will
return a BlueprintError explaining the problem. eg.
"errors": [
{
"id": "BlueprintsError",
"msg": "Invalid 'version', must use Semantic Versioning: is not in dotted-tri format"
}
]
This is enforced on new blueprints (including the workspace). If a
previously stored blueprint has an invalid version and a new one is
pushed it will use the new version number instead of trying to bump the
invalid one.
This also moves the version bump logic into blueprint instead of store,
and adds an Initialize function that will make sure that the blueprint
has sane default values for any missing fields.
This includes tests for the Initialize and BumpVersion functions.
The Blueprint struct is complex, deep, and full of references. This
means that any changes to it in memory will persist. Sometimes you need
an actual copy of it, so this adds DeepCopy which uses the json.Marshal
and Unmarshal functions to create a deep copy with no references to the
original.
This is not very efficient, but the alternative is adding Copy functions
to all the member structs and then calling them to build the copy.
Introduce the `distro` package, which contains an interface for OS
implementations. Its main purpose is to convert a blueprint to a
distro-specific pipeline.
Also introduce the `distro/fedora30` package. It is the first
implementation of the distro interface. Most of its code has been copied
with minimal modifications from the blueprint package.
The `blueprint` package is now back to serving a single purpose:
representing a weldr blueprint. It does not depend on the `pipeline`
package anymore.
Change osbuild-composer and osbuild-pipeline to use the new API,
hard-coding "fedora-30". This looks a bit weird now, but is the same
behavior as before.
All test cases now also take an "distro" key in the "compose" object.
These tests (will) test more than just image-info: they'll take a
blueprint, verify that `osbuild-pipeline` generates the correct
pipeline, run osbuild with that pipeline and verify that the resulting
image has the expected image-info output.
This change only includes the latter half (i.e., only moves the already
existing tests).
Also drop python's unittest. It was hard to control output (important
for quickly spotting failures and to make travis happy). This introduces
test/run, which runs all test cases in test/cases or the ones given on
the command line.
When a failure occurs, it prints a diff of the actual and the expected
image info.
The main difference (according to image-info) is an additional package
containing a gpg key which was used to verify packages. The one
generated by lorax-composer doesn't have this, because it doesn't verify
signatures.
Also, lorax generates an image with a separate /boot partition. This is
not yet addressed here, because osbuild doesn't support it yet.
The main difference (according to `rpm -qa`) is an additional package
containing a gpg key which was used to verify packages. The one
generated by lorax-composer doesn't have this, because it doesn't verify
signatures.
The main difference (according to image-info) is an additional package
containing a gpg key which was used to verify packages. The one
generated by lorax-composer doesn't have this, because it doesn't verify
signatures.
Also, lorax generates an image with a separate /boot partition. This is
not yet addressed here, because osbuild doesn't support it yet.
The main difference (according to image-info) is an additional package
containing a gpg key which was used to verify packages. The one
generated by lorax-composer doesn't have this, because it doesn't verify
signatures.
A test case is now expressed purely by dropping in a json document in
`tools/test_image_info/pipelines`. It should contain the input compose
(output format and blueprint) as well as the expected pipeline. All the
existing tests are moved over to this format.
This shares the same infrastructure as the image tests, ideally we want
to run the blueprint tests and the image tests against the same pipelines.
For now, test cases are skipped from the blueprint tests if they do not
contain a 'compose' section, and from the image tests if they do not
cotain an 'expected' section. In the future we may want to make both
mandatory.
Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
