Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Gundersen
fa015a70f6 rcm: rework the API for submitting composes
The API allowed composes to have multiple architectures, image
types and repositories. Turns out that's not exactly what we want
it is not clear how to combine the lits of each. Each architecture
might not combine with each image type, and it is not clear which
repositories are need for each image build. Lastly, while allowing
different image builds to have different distros in the same
compose does not appear immediately useful, there is no particular
reason to disallow that. This patch reworks the way composes are
specified.

The intention remains the same, to be able to submit several image
builds as one compose. But rather than taking arrays of image types
and architectures, take one array of image builds instead, each of
which consists of one distro, one architecture, one image build and
an array of repositories.

In a follow-up patch they will also each contain an array of upload
targets.

This means that each image build will have the same sort of structure
as a compose request in the weldr API. The reason we want to submit
an array of them rather than have them as individual composes, is that
in a follow-up patch we will introduce the concept of a "finalizer",
or "call-back" or something to that effect, which will be triggered
when all the images have been built successfully. The use-case is,
as always, koji, which requires this.

Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
2020-03-29 16:08:04 +02:00
Tom Gundersen
1345ca77fd store: drop the distro registry
This was now unused.

Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
2020-03-22 22:26:09 +01:00
Lars Karlitski
0f1a014aca store: don't keep a "default" distro
Only the weldr API has the concept of a default distro. Pass that distro
explicitly to `PushCompose()` and fetch the distro from the compose in
all other functions that accessed Store.Distro.
2020-03-18 08:33:42 +01:00
Lars Karlitski
c2c8fae093 store: give ComposeRequest a real distro
`ComposeRequest` included a `common.Distribution`, which had to be
resolved in PushComposeRequest. Use a real `distro.Distro` object here,
and push resolving it to the rcm package.

Change the `Distribution` on the (lower-case) `composeRequest` to a
string. This struct represents the incoming request. Since we're now
resolving the real distro object from the registry in the same function,
it seems redundant to validate the incoming distro twice.
2020-03-18 08:33:42 +01:00
Lars Karlitski
87e9c39532 distro: panic less often
Return errors from all distro's New() functions instead of logging and
returning nil. Also, return errors instead of panicking from
NewRegistry() and NewDefaultRegistry().
2020-03-03 11:53:06 +01:00
Lars Karlitski
e5eb673be6 distro: rename awkwardly named function
WithSingleDistro() doesn't follow go's naming convention for creating
objects (New*). Rename it to NewRegistry() and rename the old
NewRegistry() to NewDefaultRegistry().

The idea is that NewRegistry() can be used to create full Registry
objects from outside the package. NewDefaultRegistry() is a convenience
function that creates a Registry with all known distros.
2020-03-03 11:53:06 +01:00
Martin Sehnoutka
923a0b0b97 rcm: introduce rpmmd member of the api structure
This is needed for unit tests, because it wasn't possible to mock the
rpmmd module before. This also requires that the checksum is moved to
the compose request and evaluated in the endpoint handler instead of
push compose. I think it makes sense to have the checksum in the compose
request directly.

Also a "module platform ID" is required now, but we don't have the
"global" distribution any more, so this patch introduces mapping from a
distribution to the module platform ID.
2020-02-20 13:04:28 +01:00
Martin Sehnoutka
e791f51e2e rcm: use pushcomposerequest instead of pushcompose
the new version is better suited for the need of this API
2020-02-20 13:04:28 +01:00
Brian C. Lane
422a25edad Use distro_mock in rcm API test 2020-02-19 23:37:45 +01:00
Martin Sehnoutka
76947da8d5 RCM API: drop the checksum requirement for submit
The repositories used by RCM never change, there is no need for them to
include checksum of the repository.

Also rework the tests as the store will change in following commits
(store now needs to include a registry of all distros because we can do
cross-distro builds)
2020-02-12 11:17:26 +01:00
Martin Sehnoutka
4f63b54a16 Introduce RCM API
It contains two basic endpoints:
 * POST /v1/compose
 * GET /v1/compose/<uuid>
It passes all the tests, but cannot be used for the intended use case
because the store API does not (yet) support distributions and
architectures as a parameters.
2020-01-15 15:46:52 +01:00