This makes two changes simultaneously, to avoid too much churn:
- move accessors from being on the blueprint struct to the
customizations struct, and
- pass the customizations struct rather than the whole blueprint
as argumnet to distro.Manifest().
@larskarlitski pointed out in a previous review that it feels
redundant to pass the whole blueprint as well as the list of
packages to the Manifest funciton. Indeed it is, so this
simplifies things a bit.
Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Introduce the `distro` package, which contains an interface for OS
implementations. Its main purpose is to convert a blueprint to a
distro-specific pipeline.
Also introduce the `distro/fedora30` package. It is the first
implementation of the distro interface. Most of its code has been copied
with minimal modifications from the blueprint package.
The `blueprint` package is now back to serving a single purpose:
representing a weldr blueprint. It does not depend on the `pipeline`
package anymore.
Change osbuild-composer and osbuild-pipeline to use the new API,
hard-coding "fedora-30". This looks a bit weird now, but is the same
behavior as before.
All test cases now also take an "distro" key in the "compose" object.
List of currently unsupported ones:
- [[repos.git]]
- [customizations.kernel]
- [[groups]]
- [[packages]] and [[modules]]
Some of customizations have unimplemented behaviour, see TODOs
