The image definition is shared with the latest RHEL 8.y one (8.4 currently).
I expect that we the introduction of 8.5 support, we point the centos 8
distro at it.
The test repositories and manifests use the official CentOS composes. From
what I can tell, they are persistent. This is not guaranteed though, so we
might need to switch to RPMRepo at some point.
The "classic" CentOS 8 should also be buildable but due to the chicken and egg
issue (this commit will get into Centos "8.4" but Centos "8.4" isn't a thing
yet), we cannot test it and therefore it might be broken.
Signed-off-by: Ondřej Budai <ondrej@budai.cz>
Optionally allow a pacakge set to be included in the compose request.
The specified packages are added to the base packages before
depsolving. As the base packages differ between the image types
the package customizations may have different results on the different
images part of the compose request.
Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Expose a more detailed job status result - specifically, include upload status
alongside image status. Expand openapi.yml accordingly and add an UploadStatus
field to the OSBuildJobResult struct. At the moment, only represent the
"success" and "failure" states of UploadStatus - to differentiate between
"pending" and "running" would involve significant design decisions and should be
addressed in a separate commit.
rhel 8.4 tests are added. The configs are based off of those used for
rhel 8.3. The Schutzbot Mockbuild, Base, Image, Integration, and OSTree
tests are added for 8.4. Repo overrides are added for the rhel 8.4 tests
so that the tests use rpmrepo snapshots.
The mockbuild uses the jenkins rhel84-nightly-repo credential to
override the rhel mock template's repos with rhel 8.4 nightly repos.
These repos are stored in a credential because they are internal links.
The image tests and koji tests need a special distro selector since the
rhel-8 test cases are only for rhel 8 versions less than 8.4. The rhel
8.4 tests are named with the rhel-84 pattern whereas the other rhel 8
versions have the rhel-8 pattern.
Also, instead of having only rhel-8 and rhel-8-beta repo configs for the
tests, we now have a specific repo config for each rhel release we test.
The repo is also now pulled from an rpmrepo snapshot. For whichever
distro is being tested, the approriate repo config will be copied to
/etc/osbuild-composer/repositories as rhel-8 and rhel-8-beta since this
is the naming osbuild-composer looks for. For testing purposes, the
rhel-8 and rhel-8-beta repo should be the same since eventually all rhel
releases will go from beta to not beta. The fedora repo overrides are
already done in tools/provision.sh so the rhel override is set there as
well. Currently, only rhel 8.4 requires an override.
Don't use common.State anymore, because it has different values from
what's defined in openapi.yml. It makes sense to have these strings
defined in the same package as the spec — ideally, the code generator
would make them for us.
While at it, add a "running" status.
Fix the api.sh test to use these new statuses. Thanks to Ondřej Budai
for an additional fix there.
The test package should be self-contained and contain all the configuration
necessary for a known-good test run (minus secrets). This moves repo
overrides from the test orchestration into the test package.
We want all the external sources (including boot isos and repositories) to
be pinned by their content hash, and never use anything that is not strictly
defined. This moves us in the right direction, but we still have some tests
to update to use these shipped repos rather than official mirrors.
One remaining challenge is that we must make sure all our test runners have
access to the RHEL snapshots, which is not currently the case for the runners
in EC2, but a solution is in the works.
Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Attempt to clarify the structure of our tests. Each test case is now
encapsulated in a script in `test/cases`. Each of these scripts should
be runnable on a pristine machine and be independent of each other. It
is up to the test-orchestractor to decide if they should be run
consequtively instance, or in parallel on separate instances. Each
script can execute several tests and call whatever helper binaries
is desired. However, each case should be assumed to always run as one.