debian-forge-composer/vendor/github.com/titanous/rocacheck/rocacheck.go
Ondřej Budai 29f66a251f go.mod: update github.com/containers/image/v5
Version 5.22 introduced a new option to /etc/containers/policy.json called
keyPaths, see

https://github.com/containers/image/pull/1609

EL9 immediately took advantage of this new feature and started using it, see
04645c4a84

This quickly became an issue in our code: The go library (containers/image)
parses the configuration file very strictly and refuses to create a client
when policy.json with an unknown key is present on the filesystem. As we
used 5.21.1 that doesn't know the new key, our unit tests started to
failing when containers-common was present.

Reproducer:
podman run --pull=always --rm -it centos:stream9
dnf install -y dnf-plugins-core
dnf config-manager --set-enabled crb
dnf install -y gpgme-devel libassuan-devel krb5-devel golang git-core
git clone https://github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer
cd osbuild-composer

# install the new containers-common and run the test
dnf install -y https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/packages/containers-common/1/44.el9/x86_64/containers-common-1-44.el9.x86_64.rpm
go test -count 1 ./...

# this returns:
--- FAIL: TestClientResolve (0.00s)
    client_test.go:31:
        	Error Trace:	client_test.go:31
        	Error:      	Received unexpected error:
        	            	Unknown key "keyPaths"
        	            	invalid policy in "/etc/containers/policy.json"
        	            	github.com/containers/image/v5/signature.NewPolicyFromFile
        	            		/osbuild-composer/vendor/github.com/containers/image/v5/signature/policy_config.go:88
        	            	github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/container.NewClient
        	            		/osbuild-composer/internal/container/client.go:123
        	            	github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/container_test.TestClientResolve
        	            		/osbuild-composer/internal/container/client_test.go:29
        	            	testing.tRunner
        	            		/usr/lib/golang/src/testing/testing.go:1439
        	            	runtime.goexit
        	            		/usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:1571
        	Test:       	TestClientResolve
    client_test.go:32:
        	Error Trace:	client_test.go:32
        	Error:      	Expected value not to be nil.
        	Test:       	TestClientResolve

 When run with an older containers-common, it succeeds:
 dnf install -y https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/packages/containers-common/1/40.el9/x86_64/containers-common-1-40.el9.x86_64.rpm
 go test -count 1 ./...
 PASS

To sum it up, I had to upgrade github.com/containers/image/v5 to v5.22.0.
Unfortunately, this wasn't so simple, see

go get github.com/containers/image/v5@latest
go: github.com/containers/image/v5@v5.22.0 requires
	github.com/letsencrypt/boulder@v0.0.0-20220331220046-b23ab962616e requires
	github.com/honeycombio/beeline-go@v1.1.1 requires
	github.com/gobuffalo/pop/v5@v5.3.1 requires
	github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3@v2.0.3+incompatible: reading github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3/go.mod at revision v2.0.3: unknown revision v2.0.3

It turns out that github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3@v2.0.3+incompatible has been
recently retracted https://github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3/pull/998 and this
broke a ton of packages depending on it. I was able to fix it by adding

exclude github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 v2.0.3+incompatible

to our go.mod, see
https://github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3/issues/975#issuecomment-955661657

After adding it,
go get github.com/containers/image/v5@latest
succeeded and tools/prepare-source.sh took care of the rest.

Signed-off-by: Ondřej Budai <ondrej@budai.cz>
2022-08-29 10:25:38 +02:00

52 lines
1.2 KiB
Go

// Package rocacheck checks if a key was generated by broken Infineon code and
// is vulnerable to factorization via the Return of Coppersmith's Attack (ROCA)
// / CVE-2017-15361.
package rocacheck
import (
"crypto/rsa"
"math/big"
)
type test struct {
Prime *big.Int
Fingerprints map[int64]struct{}
}
var tests = make([]test, 17)
func init() {
bigOne := big.NewInt(1)
n := &big.Int{}
// relations table from https://github.com/crocs-muni/roca/pull/40
for i, r := range [][2]int64{
{2, 11}, {6, 13}, {8, 17}, {9, 19}, {3, 37}, {26, 53}, {20, 61},
{35, 71}, {24, 73}, {13, 79}, {6, 97}, {51, 103}, {53, 107},
{54, 109}, {42, 127}, {50, 151}, {78, 157},
} {
fps := make(map[int64]struct{})
bp := big.NewInt(r[1])
br := big.NewInt(r[0])
for j := int64(0); j < r[1]; j++ {
if n.Exp(big.NewInt(j), br, bp).Cmp(bigOne) == 0 {
fps[j] = struct{}{}
}
}
tests[i] = test{
Prime: big.NewInt(r[1]),
Fingerprints: fps,
}
}
}
// IsWeak returns true if a RSA public key is vulnerable to Return of
// Coppersmith's Attack (ROCA).
func IsWeak(k *rsa.PublicKey) bool {
tmp := &big.Int{}
for _, t := range tests {
if _, ok := t.Fingerprints[tmp.Mod(k.N, t.Prime).Int64()]; !ok {
return false
}
}
return true
}