6601c32f7e
The s390x platform definition would previously always return `false` when calling its `GetZiplSupport()` method. This was obviously not correct. The method is meant to suite a similar purpose as `GetBIOSPlatform()` and `GetUEFIVendor()` on BIOS / UEFI enabled platforms. Change the S390X platform struct to contain `Zipl` member instead of `BIOS`, which is technically more correct. Make sure that the value set in the `Zipl` struct member is returned by `GetZiplSupport()`. Ensure that `FirmwarePackages` from `BasePlatform` are added to the list of packages returned by `GetPackages()`. Adjust distro definitions using the `S390X` platform. Signed-off-by: Tomáš Hozza <thozza@redhat.com>
32 lines
641 B
Go
32 lines
641 B
Go
package platform
|
|
|
|
type S390X struct {
|
|
BasePlatform
|
|
Zipl bool
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (p *S390X) GetArch() Arch {
|
|
return ARCH_S390X
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (p *S390X) GetZiplSupport() bool {
|
|
return p.Zipl
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (p *S390X) GetPackages() []string {
|
|
packages := p.BasePlatform.FirmwarePackages
|
|
// TODO: should these packages be present also in images not intended for booting?
|
|
packages = append(packages,
|
|
"dracut-config-generic",
|
|
"s390utils-base",
|
|
"s390utils-core",
|
|
)
|
|
return packages
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (p *S390X) GetBuildPackages() []string {
|
|
// TODO: should these packages be present also in images not intended for booting?
|
|
return []string{
|
|
"s390utils-base",
|
|
}
|
|
}
|