particle-os/debian-forge
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Complete file structure reorganization for 1:1 osbuild compatibility

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
robojerk 2025-08-26 15:38:59 -07:00
parent 61e7caaddb
commit 56f029cbc0
77 changed files with 5 additions and 956 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

276
docs/debian/flowchart-debian.md Executable file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,276 @@
# Debian Atomic Ecosystem: Top-Down Linear Flow
## Overview
This flowchart shows the proposed Debian Atomic ecosystem, mapping Fedora bootc components to Debian equivalents and discussing implementation options.
## The Proposed Debian Flow
```mermaid
graph TD
%% Start: Package Sources
A[Debian Package Sources] --> B[Debian Build Infrastructure]
B --> C[Build Environments]
C --> D[Debian Packages in Repositories]
%% Configuration Management
D --> E[debian-atomic-config Repository]
E --> F[Treefiles (YAML)]
F --> G[Package Groups & Variants]
G --> H[Debian Package Group Sync]
%% Build Process (with apt-ostree)
D --> I[apt-ostree compose tree]
F --> I
I --> J[OSTree Repository with Commits]
J --> J1[ostree-importer to official repo]
J1 --> K[apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate]
K --> L[Special bootc containers]
%% Base Images Created
L --> M[quay.io/debian/debian-bootc:13]
L --> N[Debian Silverblue]
L --> O[Debian Kinoite]
L --> P[Other Debian Atomic variants]
%% User Customization Paths
M --> Q[Users build FROM base images]
Q --> R[Custom bootc containers]
%% Path 1: Direct Containerfile
Q --> S[Write Containerfile directly]
S --> T[Container-First build path]
%% Path 2: BlueBuild equivalent
Q --> U[Write recipe.yml]
U --> V[Debian BlueBuild generates Containerfile]
V --> T
%% Debian BlueBuild processing
U --> W[Debian BlueBuild CLI processes recipe.yml]
W --> X[Generates Containerfile automatically]
X --> T
T --> Y[Custom Debian Atomic Images]
Y --> Z[ISO, QCOW2, RAW formats]
%% Production conversion tools
R --> AA[deb-bootc-image-builder]
M --> AA
AA --> BB[Standard bootable images]
R --> CC[osbuilder/osbuild for Debian]
M --> CC
CC --> DD[Advanced custom images]
CC --> DD1[OSTree composition]
CC --> DD2[Package management]
CC --> DD3[Complex build orchestration]
%% Traditional Debian path
D --> EE[Debian Installer System]
EE --> FF[Traditional Debian ISOs]
%% User experience limitations
Y --> GG[Steep Learning Curve]
Y --> HH[Compatibility Gaps]
Y --> II[Slow apt-ostree Operations]
Y --> JJ[Hardware/Driver Issues]
%% User lifecycle operations
M --> KK[apt-ostree upgrade]
M --> LL[apt-ostree rollback]
M --> MM[apt-ostree rebase]
%% These affect the user experience
KK --> NN[System updates]
LL --> OO[System rollbacks]
MM --> PP[System rebasing]
```
## Key Components for Debian Atomic
### 1. Package Infrastructure
- **Input**: Debian Package Sources
- **Output**: Debian Packages in Repositories
- **Tools**: Debian Build Infrastructure, Build Environments
- **Options**:
- Use existing Debian build infrastructure
- Build custom build system
- Integrate with existing Debian CI/CD
### 2. Configuration Management
- **Input**: Debian Packages + Debian package groups
- **Output**: Treefiles (YAML) defining variants
- **Tools**: debian-atomic-config repository, Debian Package Group Sync
- **Options**:
- Create new debian-atomic-config repository
- Extend existing Debian configuration tools
- Use Debian's existing package grouping system
### 3. Build Process
- **Input**: Debian Packages + Treefiles
- **Output**: Special bootc containers
- **Tools**: apt-ostree compose tree → ostree-importer → apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate
- **Options**:
- Implement apt-ostree from scratch
- Fork and adapt rpm-ostree for Debian
- Use existing Debian package management tools
### 4. Base Images
- **Input**: Special bootc containers
- **Output**: Official Debian bootc containers and variants
- **Examples**: quay.io/debian/debian-bootc:13, Debian Silverblue, Kinoite
- **Options**:
- Build Debian-specific variants
- Adapt existing Debian live images
- Create minimal Debian base
### 5. User Customization
- **Input**: Base bootc images
- **Output**: Custom bootc containers
- **Paths**:
- Direct: Containerfile → Custom container
- Debian BlueBuild: recipe.yml → Debian BlueBuild → Containerfile → Custom container
- **Options**:
- Adapt BlueBuild for Debian
- Create Debian-specific customization tools
- Use existing Debian image building tools
### 6. Production Tools
- **Input**: Custom bootc containers
- **Output**: Bootable disk images
- **Tools**:
- deb-bootc-image-builder: Standard bootable images
- osbuilder/osbuild for Debian: Advanced customization, OSTree composition, package management, complex build orchestration
- **Options**:
- Adapt existing Debian image building tools
- Extend osbuilder for Debian
- Create Debian-specific tools
### 7. Traditional Debian
- **Input**: Debian Packages
- **Output**: Traditional Debian ISOs
- **Tools**: Debian Installer System
- **Options**:
- Use existing Debian installer infrastructure
- Create new installer for atomic variants
- Integrate with existing Debian tools
### 8. User Limitations
- **Input**: Custom Debian Atomic Images
- **Output**: User experience challenges
- **Issues**: Learning curve, compatibility gaps, slow operations, hardware limitations
- **Options**:
- Address known Fedora limitations
- Leverage Debian's strengths
- Create better user experience
### 9. User Lifecycle Operations
- **Input**: Base bootc images
- **Output**: System management operations
- **Operations**: apt-ostree upgrade, rollback, rebase
- **Purpose**: Fundamental to the "atomic" nature of the system
- **Options**:
- Implement apt-ostree commands
- Adapt existing Debian package management
- Create new atomic management tools
## Implementation Options Discussion
### **apt-ostree Implementation Options**
#### Option 1: Build from Scratch
- **Pros**: Complete control, Debian-specific optimizations
- **Cons**: Massive development effort, need to reimplement all functionality
- **Timeline**: 2-3 years minimum
#### Option 2: Fork and Adapt rpm-ostree
- **Pros**: Leverage existing codebase, proven functionality
- **Cons**: RPM-specific assumptions, significant adaptation needed
- **Timeline**: 1-2 years
#### Option 3: Debian Package Manager Integration
- **Pros**: Use existing Debian tools, familiar to Debian developers
- **Cons**: May not provide atomic guarantees, significant architectural changes
- **Timeline**: 1-2 years
### **Build Infrastructure Options**
#### Option 1: Use Existing Debian Infrastructure
- **Pros**: Proven, maintained, integrated
- **Cons**: May not support OSTree workflows, limited customization
- **Timeline**: 6 months - 1 year
#### Option 2: Build Custom Infrastructure
- **Pros**: Complete control, optimized for atomic workflows
- **Cons**: Massive development effort, maintenance burden
- **Timeline**: 2-3 years
#### Option 3: Hybrid Approach
- **Pros**: Leverage existing tools where possible, custom where needed
- **Cons**: Integration complexity, potential conflicts
- **Timeline**: 1-2 years
### **Configuration Management Options**
#### Option 1: New debian-atomic-config Repository
- **Pros**: Clean slate, atomic-specific design
- **Cons**: New tool to maintain, separate from existing Debian tools
- **Timeline**: 6 months - 1 year
#### Option 2: Extend Existing Debian Tools
- **Pros**: Integration with existing workflow, familiar to developers
- **Cons**: May not support atomic concepts well, architectural limitations
- **Timeline**: 1 year
#### Option 3: Adapt Fedora's workstation-ostree-config
- **Pros**: Proven approach, existing examples
- **Cons**: RPM-specific assumptions, significant adaptation needed
- **Timeline**: 6 months - 1 year
## What Each Step Produces (Debian Context)
| Step | Input | Output | Tool | Implementation Status |
|------|-------|--------|------|----------------------|
| Package Sources | Source code | Debian Packages | Debian Build Infrastructure | ✅ Exists |
| Configuration | Packages + package groups | Treefiles (YAML) | debian-atomic-config | ❌ Needs Implementation |
| Build Process | Packages + Treefiles | OSTree commits | apt-ostree compose tree | ❌ Needs Implementation |
| Import | OSTree commits | Official repo | ostree-importer | ❌ Needs Implementation |
| Encapsulate | OSTree commits | bootc containers | apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate | ❌ Needs Implementation |
| Base Images | bootc containers | Official variants | Container registry | ❌ Needs Implementation |
| User Customization | Base images | Custom containers | Containerfile or Debian BlueBuild | ❌ Needs Implementation |
| Production Tools | Custom containers | Bootable images | deb-bootc-image-builder/osbuilder | ❌ Needs Implementation |
| Traditional Debian | Packages | ISOs | Debian Installer System | ✅ Exists |
| User Lifecycle | Base images | System operations | apt-ostree commands | ❌ Needs Implementation |
## Implementation Priority
### **Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (6-12 months)**
1. **apt-ostree implementation** - Core tool for OSTree management
2. **debian-atomic-config repository** - Configuration management
3. **Basic build pipeline** - From packages to OSTree commits
### **Phase 2: Bootc Integration (6-12 months)**
1. **apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate** - Create bootc containers
2. **Base Debian bootc images** - Official variants
3. **Basic user customization** - Containerfile support
### **Phase 3: User Tools (6-12 months)**
1. **Debian BlueBuild equivalent** - User-friendly customization
2. **deb-bootc-image-builder** - Production image creation
3. **User lifecycle management** - upgrade, rollback, rebase
### **Phase 4: Advanced Features (6-12 months)**
1. **osbuilder/osbuild integration** - Advanced customization
2. **Performance optimizations** - Address known limitations
3. **Production deployment** - Real-world testing and refinement
## What This Shows
This flowchart demonstrates that Debian Atomic requires:
- Complete package infrastructure (mostly exists)
- Configuration management system (needs implementation)
- Specialized build tools (apt-ostree needs implementation)
- User abstraction layers (needs implementation)
- Multiple production conversion options (needs implementation)
- User lifecycle management (needs implementation)
The main challenge is implementing the **apt-ostree ecosystem** and **bootc integration**, as most of the existing Debian infrastructure can be leveraged or adapted.