Remove tests that require us to have at least one feature with a toolsVersion
If no features have a `toolsVersion` property, we'll never hit those code paths, so it isn't that important to test them. Having a synthetic feature is an option but might create user confusion.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a52b209ec8
commit
8a9ecdff2e
3 changed files with 1 additions and 37 deletions
12
lib/feature-flags.test.js
generated
12
lib/feature-flags.test.js
generated
|
|
@ -196,18 +196,6 @@ for (const feature of Object.keys(feature_flags_1.featureConfig)) {
|
|||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If we ever run into a situation where we no longer have any features that
|
||||
// specify a minimum version or required tools feature, then we will have a
|
||||
// bunch of code no longer being tested. This is unlikely, and this test will
|
||||
// fail if that happens.
|
||||
// If we do end up in that situation, then we should consider adding a synthetic
|
||||
// feature with a minimum version that is only used for tests.
|
||||
(0, ava_1.default)("At least one feature has a minimum version specified", (t) => {
|
||||
t.assert(Object.values(feature_flags_1.featureConfig).some((f) => f.minimumVersion !== undefined), "At least one feature should have a minimum version specified");
|
||||
t.assert(Object.values(feature_flags_1.featureConfig).some((f) => f.toolsFeature !== undefined), "At least one feature should have a required tools feature specified");
|
||||
// An even less likely scenario is that we no longer have any features.
|
||||
t.assert(Object.values(feature_flags_1.featureConfig).length > 0, "There should be at least one feature");
|
||||
});
|
||||
(0, ava_1.default)("Feature flags are saved to disk", async (t) => {
|
||||
await (0, util_1.withTmpDir)(async (tmpDir) => {
|
||||
const features = setUpFeatureFlagTests(tmpDir);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
|
|
@ -285,30 +285,6 @@ for (const feature of Object.keys(featureConfig)) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we ever run into a situation where we no longer have any features that
|
||||
// specify a minimum version or required tools feature, then we will have a
|
||||
// bunch of code no longer being tested. This is unlikely, and this test will
|
||||
// fail if that happens.
|
||||
// If we do end up in that situation, then we should consider adding a synthetic
|
||||
// feature with a minimum version that is only used for tests.
|
||||
test("At least one feature has a minimum version specified", (t) => {
|
||||
t.assert(
|
||||
Object.values(featureConfig).some((f) => f.minimumVersion !== undefined),
|
||||
"At least one feature should have a minimum version specified",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
t.assert(
|
||||
Object.values(featureConfig).some((f) => f.toolsFeature !== undefined),
|
||||
"At least one feature should have a required tools feature specified",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// An even less likely scenario is that we no longer have any features.
|
||||
t.assert(
|
||||
Object.values(featureConfig).length > 0,
|
||||
"There should be at least one feature",
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("Feature flags are saved to disk", async (t) => {
|
||||
await withTmpDir(async (tmpDir) => {
|
||||
const features = setUpFeatureFlagTests(tmpDir);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue