robojerk/codeql-action

Rename new analysis summary feature flag

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Henry Mercer 2023-08-11 15:51:44 +01:00
parent 2160dd3b55
commit 9a510d9b07
12 changed files with 28 additions and 28 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
lib/codeql.test.js generated
View file

@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ for (const { featureEnabled, codeqlVersion, flagPassed, negativeFlagPassed, } of
sinon.stub(codeqlObject, "getVersion").resolves(codeqlVersion);
// safeWhich throws because of the test CodeQL object.
sinon.stub(safeWhich, "safeWhich").resolves("");
await codeqlObject.databaseInterpretResults("", [], "", "", "", "-v", "", stubConfig, (0, testing_utils_1.createFeatures)(featureEnabled ? [feature_flags_1.Feature.NewAnalysisSummaryEnabled] : []), (0, logging_1.getRunnerLogger)(true));
await codeqlObject.databaseInterpretResults("", [], "", "", "", "-v", "", stubConfig, (0, testing_utils_1.createFeatures)(featureEnabled ? [feature_flags_1.Feature.AnalysisSummaryV2Enabled] : []), (0, logging_1.getRunnerLogger)(true));
t.is(runnerConstructorStub.firstCall.args[1].includes("--new-analysis-summary"), flagPassed, `--new-analysis-summary should${flagPassed ? "" : "n't"} be passed`);
t.is(runnerConstructorStub.firstCall.args[1].includes("--no-new-analysis-summary"), negativeFlagPassed, `--no-new-analysis-summary should${negativeFlagPassed ? "" : "n't"} be passed`);
});