Update checked-in dependencies
This commit is contained in:
parent
79817eb679
commit
9c3b394d7f
402 changed files with 12598 additions and 2912 deletions
89
node_modules/eslint/lib/config/flat-config-schema.js
generated
vendored
89
node_modules/eslint/lib/config/flat-config-schema.js
generated
vendored
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,16 @@
|
|||
|
||||
"use strict";
|
||||
|
||||
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Requirements
|
||||
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note: This can be removed in ESLint v9 because structuredClone is available globally
|
||||
* starting in Node.js v17.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const structuredClone = require("@ungap/structured-clone").default;
|
||||
|
||||
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Type Definitions
|
||||
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
|
@ -119,7 +129,7 @@ function normalizeRuleOptions(ruleOptions) {
|
|||
: [ruleOptions];
|
||||
|
||||
finalOptions[0] = ruleSeverities.get(finalOptions[0]);
|
||||
return finalOptions;
|
||||
return structuredClone(finalOptions);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
|
@ -378,48 +388,57 @@ const rulesSchema = {
|
|||
...second
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
for (const ruleId of Object.keys(result)) {
|
||||
|
||||
// avoid hairy edge case
|
||||
if (ruleId === "__proto__") {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
|
||||
/* eslint-disable-next-line no-proto -- Though deprecated, may still be present */
|
||||
delete result.__proto__;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
// avoid hairy edge case
|
||||
if (ruleId === "__proto__") {
|
||||
|
||||
/* eslint-disable-next-line no-proto -- Though deprecated, may still be present */
|
||||
delete result.__proto__;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result[ruleId] = normalizeRuleOptions(result[ruleId]);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If either rule config is missing, then the correct
|
||||
* config is already present and we just need to normalize
|
||||
* the severity.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(ruleId in first) || !(ruleId in second)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const firstRuleOptions = normalizeRuleOptions(first[ruleId]);
|
||||
const secondRuleOptions = normalizeRuleOptions(second[ruleId]);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the second rule config only has a severity (length of 1),
|
||||
* then use that severity and keep the rest of the options from
|
||||
* the first rule config.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (secondRuleOptions.length === 1) {
|
||||
result[ruleId] = [secondRuleOptions[0], ...firstRuleOptions.slice(1)];
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In any other situation, then the second rule config takes
|
||||
* precedence. That means the value at `result[ruleId]` is
|
||||
* already correct and no further work is necessary.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
} catch (ex) {
|
||||
throw new Error(`Key "${ruleId}": ${ex.message}`, { cause: ex });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result[ruleId] = normalizeRuleOptions(result[ruleId]);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If either rule config is missing, then the correct
|
||||
* config is already present and we just need to normalize
|
||||
* the severity.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(ruleId in first) || !(ruleId in second)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const firstRuleOptions = normalizeRuleOptions(first[ruleId]);
|
||||
const secondRuleOptions = normalizeRuleOptions(second[ruleId]);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the second rule config only has a severity (length of 1),
|
||||
* then use that severity and keep the rest of the options from
|
||||
* the first rule config.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (secondRuleOptions.length === 1) {
|
||||
result[ruleId] = [secondRuleOptions[0], ...firstRuleOptions.slice(1)];
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In any other situation, then the second rule config takes
|
||||
* precedence. That means the value at `result[ruleId]` is
|
||||
* already correct and no further work is necessary.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
validate(value) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue