276 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Executable file
276 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Executable file
# Debian Atomic Ecosystem: Top-Down Linear Flow
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
This flowchart shows the proposed Debian Atomic ecosystem, mapping Fedora bootc components to Debian equivalents and discussing implementation options.
|
|
|
|
## The Proposed Debian Flow
|
|
|
|
```mermaid
|
|
graph TD
|
|
%% Start: Package Sources
|
|
A[Debian Package Sources] --> B[Debian Build Infrastructure]
|
|
B --> C[Build Environments]
|
|
C --> D[Debian Packages in Repositories]
|
|
|
|
%% Configuration Management
|
|
D --> E[debian-atomic-config Repository]
|
|
E --> F[Treefiles (YAML)]
|
|
F --> G[Package Groups & Variants]
|
|
G --> H[Debian Package Group Sync]
|
|
|
|
%% Build Process (with apt-ostree)
|
|
D --> I[apt-ostree compose tree]
|
|
F --> I
|
|
I --> J[OSTree Repository with Commits]
|
|
J --> J1[ostree-importer to official repo]
|
|
J1 --> K[apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate]
|
|
K --> L[Special bootc containers]
|
|
|
|
%% Base Images Created
|
|
L --> M[quay.io/debian/debian-bootc:13]
|
|
L --> N[Debian Silverblue]
|
|
L --> O[Debian Kinoite]
|
|
L --> P[Other Debian Atomic variants]
|
|
|
|
%% User Customization Paths
|
|
M --> Q[Users build FROM base images]
|
|
Q --> R[Custom bootc containers]
|
|
|
|
%% Path 1: Direct Containerfile
|
|
Q --> S[Write Containerfile directly]
|
|
S --> T[Container-First build path]
|
|
|
|
%% Path 2: BlueBuild equivalent
|
|
Q --> U[Write recipe.yml]
|
|
U --> V[Debian BlueBuild generates Containerfile]
|
|
V --> T
|
|
|
|
%% Debian BlueBuild processing
|
|
U --> W[Debian BlueBuild CLI processes recipe.yml]
|
|
W --> X[Generates Containerfile automatically]
|
|
X --> T
|
|
T --> Y[Custom Debian Atomic Images]
|
|
Y --> Z[ISO, QCOW2, RAW formats]
|
|
|
|
%% Production conversion tools
|
|
R --> AA[deb-bootc-image-builder]
|
|
M --> AA
|
|
AA --> BB[Standard bootable images]
|
|
|
|
R --> CC[osbuilder/osbuild for Debian]
|
|
M --> CC
|
|
CC --> DD[Advanced custom images]
|
|
CC --> DD1[OSTree composition]
|
|
CC --> DD2[Package management]
|
|
CC --> DD3[Complex build orchestration]
|
|
|
|
%% Traditional Debian path
|
|
D --> EE[Debian Installer System]
|
|
EE --> FF[Traditional Debian ISOs]
|
|
|
|
%% User experience limitations
|
|
Y --> GG[Steep Learning Curve]
|
|
Y --> HH[Compatibility Gaps]
|
|
Y --> II[Slow apt-ostree Operations]
|
|
Y --> JJ[Hardware/Driver Issues]
|
|
|
|
%% User lifecycle operations
|
|
M --> KK[apt-ostree upgrade]
|
|
M --> LL[apt-ostree rollback]
|
|
M --> MM[apt-ostree rebase]
|
|
|
|
%% These affect the user experience
|
|
KK --> NN[System updates]
|
|
LL --> OO[System rollbacks]
|
|
MM --> PP[System rebasing]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Key Components for Debian Atomic
|
|
|
|
### 1. Package Infrastructure
|
|
- **Input**: Debian Package Sources
|
|
- **Output**: Debian Packages in Repositories
|
|
- **Tools**: Debian Build Infrastructure, Build Environments
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Use existing Debian build infrastructure
|
|
- Build custom build system
|
|
- Integrate with existing Debian CI/CD
|
|
|
|
### 2. Configuration Management
|
|
- **Input**: Debian Packages + Debian package groups
|
|
- **Output**: Treefiles (YAML) defining variants
|
|
- **Tools**: debian-atomic-config repository, Debian Package Group Sync
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Create new debian-atomic-config repository
|
|
- Extend existing Debian configuration tools
|
|
- Use Debian's existing package grouping system
|
|
|
|
### 3. Build Process
|
|
- **Input**: Debian Packages + Treefiles
|
|
- **Output**: Special bootc containers
|
|
- **Tools**: apt-ostree compose tree → ostree-importer → apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Implement apt-ostree from scratch
|
|
- Fork and adapt rpm-ostree for Debian
|
|
- Use existing Debian package management tools
|
|
|
|
### 4. Base Images
|
|
- **Input**: Special bootc containers
|
|
- **Output**: Official Debian bootc containers and variants
|
|
- **Examples**: quay.io/debian/debian-bootc:13, Debian Silverblue, Kinoite
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Build Debian-specific variants
|
|
- Adapt existing Debian live images
|
|
- Create minimal Debian base
|
|
|
|
### 5. User Customization
|
|
- **Input**: Base bootc images
|
|
- **Output**: Custom bootc containers
|
|
- **Paths**:
|
|
- Direct: Containerfile → Custom container
|
|
- Debian BlueBuild: recipe.yml → Debian BlueBuild → Containerfile → Custom container
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Adapt BlueBuild for Debian
|
|
- Create Debian-specific customization tools
|
|
- Use existing Debian image building tools
|
|
|
|
### 6. Production Tools
|
|
- **Input**: Custom bootc containers
|
|
- **Output**: Bootable disk images
|
|
- **Tools**:
|
|
- deb-bootc-image-builder: Standard bootable images
|
|
- osbuilder/osbuild for Debian: Advanced customization, OSTree composition, package management, complex build orchestration
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Adapt existing Debian image building tools
|
|
- Extend osbuilder for Debian
|
|
- Create Debian-specific tools
|
|
|
|
### 7. Traditional Debian
|
|
- **Input**: Debian Packages
|
|
- **Output**: Traditional Debian ISOs
|
|
- **Tools**: Debian Installer System
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Use existing Debian installer infrastructure
|
|
- Create new installer for atomic variants
|
|
- Integrate with existing Debian tools
|
|
|
|
### 8. User Limitations
|
|
- **Input**: Custom Debian Atomic Images
|
|
- **Output**: User experience challenges
|
|
- **Issues**: Learning curve, compatibility gaps, slow operations, hardware limitations
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Address known Fedora limitations
|
|
- Leverage Debian's strengths
|
|
- Create better user experience
|
|
|
|
### 9. User Lifecycle Operations
|
|
- **Input**: Base bootc images
|
|
- **Output**: System management operations
|
|
- **Operations**: apt-ostree upgrade, rollback, rebase
|
|
- **Purpose**: Fundamental to the "atomic" nature of the system
|
|
- **Options**:
|
|
- Implement apt-ostree commands
|
|
- Adapt existing Debian package management
|
|
- Create new atomic management tools
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Options Discussion
|
|
|
|
### **apt-ostree Implementation Options**
|
|
|
|
#### Option 1: Build from Scratch
|
|
- **Pros**: Complete control, Debian-specific optimizations
|
|
- **Cons**: Massive development effort, need to reimplement all functionality
|
|
- **Timeline**: 2-3 years minimum
|
|
|
|
#### Option 2: Fork and Adapt rpm-ostree
|
|
- **Pros**: Leverage existing codebase, proven functionality
|
|
- **Cons**: RPM-specific assumptions, significant adaptation needed
|
|
- **Timeline**: 1-2 years
|
|
|
|
#### Option 3: Debian Package Manager Integration
|
|
- **Pros**: Use existing Debian tools, familiar to Debian developers
|
|
- **Cons**: May not provide atomic guarantees, significant architectural changes
|
|
- **Timeline**: 1-2 years
|
|
|
|
### **Build Infrastructure Options**
|
|
|
|
#### Option 1: Use Existing Debian Infrastructure
|
|
- **Pros**: Proven, maintained, integrated
|
|
- **Cons**: May not support OSTree workflows, limited customization
|
|
- **Timeline**: 6 months - 1 year
|
|
|
|
#### Option 2: Build Custom Infrastructure
|
|
- **Pros**: Complete control, optimized for atomic workflows
|
|
- **Cons**: Massive development effort, maintenance burden
|
|
- **Timeline**: 2-3 years
|
|
|
|
#### Option 3: Hybrid Approach
|
|
- **Pros**: Leverage existing tools where possible, custom where needed
|
|
- **Cons**: Integration complexity, potential conflicts
|
|
- **Timeline**: 1-2 years
|
|
|
|
### **Configuration Management Options**
|
|
|
|
#### Option 1: New debian-atomic-config Repository
|
|
- **Pros**: Clean slate, atomic-specific design
|
|
- **Cons**: New tool to maintain, separate from existing Debian tools
|
|
- **Timeline**: 6 months - 1 year
|
|
|
|
#### Option 2: Extend Existing Debian Tools
|
|
- **Pros**: Integration with existing workflow, familiar to developers
|
|
- **Cons**: May not support atomic concepts well, architectural limitations
|
|
- **Timeline**: 1 year
|
|
|
|
#### Option 3: Adapt Fedora's workstation-ostree-config
|
|
- **Pros**: Proven approach, existing examples
|
|
- **Cons**: RPM-specific assumptions, significant adaptation needed
|
|
- **Timeline**: 6 months - 1 year
|
|
|
|
## What Each Step Produces (Debian Context)
|
|
|
|
| Step | Input | Output | Tool | Implementation Status |
|
|
|------|-------|--------|------|----------------------|
|
|
| Package Sources | Source code | Debian Packages | Debian Build Infrastructure | ✅ Exists |
|
|
| Configuration | Packages + package groups | Treefiles (YAML) | debian-atomic-config | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
| Build Process | Packages + Treefiles | OSTree commits | apt-ostree compose tree | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
| Import | OSTree commits | Official repo | ostree-importer | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
| Encapsulate | OSTree commits | bootc containers | apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
| Base Images | bootc containers | Official variants | Container registry | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
| User Customization | Base images | Custom containers | Containerfile or Debian BlueBuild | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
| Production Tools | Custom containers | Bootable images | deb-bootc-image-builder/osbuilder | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
| Traditional Debian | Packages | ISOs | Debian Installer System | ✅ Exists |
|
|
| User Lifecycle | Base images | System operations | apt-ostree commands | ❌ Needs Implementation |
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Priority
|
|
|
|
### **Phase 1: Core Infrastructure (6-12 months)**
|
|
1. **apt-ostree implementation** - Core tool for OSTree management
|
|
2. **debian-atomic-config repository** - Configuration management
|
|
3. **Basic build pipeline** - From packages to OSTree commits
|
|
|
|
### **Phase 2: Bootc Integration (6-12 months)**
|
|
1. **apt-ostree compose container-encapsulate** - Create bootc containers
|
|
2. **Base Debian bootc images** - Official variants
|
|
3. **Basic user customization** - Containerfile support
|
|
|
|
### **Phase 3: User Tools (6-12 months)**
|
|
1. **Debian BlueBuild equivalent** - User-friendly customization
|
|
2. **deb-bootc-image-builder** - Production image creation
|
|
3. **User lifecycle management** - upgrade, rollback, rebase
|
|
|
|
### **Phase 4: Advanced Features (6-12 months)**
|
|
1. **osbuilder/osbuild integration** - Advanced customization
|
|
2. **Performance optimizations** - Address known limitations
|
|
3. **Production deployment** - Real-world testing and refinement
|
|
|
|
## What This Shows
|
|
|
|
This flowchart demonstrates that Debian Atomic requires:
|
|
- Complete package infrastructure (mostly exists)
|
|
- Configuration management system (needs implementation)
|
|
- Specialized build tools (apt-ostree needs implementation)
|
|
- User abstraction layers (needs implementation)
|
|
- Multiple production conversion options (needs implementation)
|
|
- User lifecycle management (needs implementation)
|
|
|
|
The main challenge is implementing the **apt-ostree ecosystem** and **bootc integration**, as most of the existing Debian infrastructure can be leveraged or adapted.
|